Author Archives: Chet Brandon

Unknown's avatar

About Chet Brandon

I am a highly experienced Environmental, Health, Safety & Sustainability Professional for Fortune 500 Companies. I love the challenge of ensuring EHS&S excellence in process, manufacturing, and other heavy industry settings. The connection of EHS to Sustainability is a fascinating subject for me. I believe that the future of industrial organizations depends on the adoption of sustainable practices.

Contractor Safety Management: The Contractor Operational Integrity Model

I’m pleased to share my latest article: “The Future of Contractor Safety Management: The Contractor Operational Integrity Model.”

The impetus for this piece came from my participation on a contractor safety panel at the Avetta annual conference in Chicago in mid-May. The discussion reinforced something I believe strongly: contractor safety management is moving into a new era.

For too long, contractor safety has often been treated as a compliance and prequalification process. Those elements still matter, but they are not enough. The future is about work readiness, verified control of work, and operational integrity at the point where risk is real.

In the article, I introduce the Contractor Operational Integrity Model, built around six core elements:

Critical Risk Definition
Capability and Capacity Verification
Control of Work Discipline
Field Verification and Leadership Cadence
Performance Intelligence
Corrective Learning and System Improvement

The central message is straightforward:

Compliance is the foundation. Operational integrity is the standard.

Contractor safety is not just a safety department issue. It is a test of how well safety, operations, procurement, maintenance, and contractors operate as one system under real field conditions.

I appreciate the Avetta team for hosting a strong discussion and creating space for practical dialogue on where contractor risk management needs to go next. Continue reading

Posted in AI, Artificial Intelligence, contractor safety, enterprise risk management, Innovation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Decision-Ready Information: The Modern Standard for Leadership in Complex Organizations

Organizations are drowning in information and starving for judgment.

My latest article on LeadingEHS.com explores the concept of decision-ready information and compares it to the classic management discipline of completed staff work.

The core idea is simple: leaders do not need more dashboards, alerts, reports, or raw data. They need information that has been interpreted, contextualized, risk-ranked, and shaped into clear options and recommendations.

This discipline matters across EHS, sustainability, operations, cybersecurity, process safety, and enterprise governance. Whether we are dealing with AIoT signals, process safety data, ESG disclosures, or operational risk indicators, the challenge is the same:

-What is happening
-Why does it matter
-What could happen next
-What should we do?

Decision-ready information converts complexity into accountable leadership action. Continue reading

Posted in Business Accumen, EHS Management, Leadership, Professional Skills, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Discipline of Space: What Miles Davis’ Music Continues to Teach Me

Leadership is a personal journey. Clarity, inspiration, and insight do not come only from books, meetings, metrics, or formal training. They come from many parts of life—music, art, reflection, relationships, struggle, and the quiet moments that help us see ourselves more clearly.

My recent article reflects on how Miles Davis’ Kind of Blue continues to teach me about restraint, space, discipline, focus, and renewal.

Sometimes the lessons that shape us most arrive from unexpected places. Continue reading

Posted in Leadership, Personal Growth, Personal Reflection, Professional Skills | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Operational Integrity: The Operating Model Heavy Manufacturing Needs

Heavy manufacturing does not fail all at once. It usually fails in layers.

A workaround becomes normal. A critical control weakens. A maintenance backlog grows. A near miss is explained away because no one was hurt. Over time, the operation drifts from discipline into exposure.

That is why I believe Operational Integrity needs to be treated as an overarching operating model, not just another safety, reliability, or compliance initiative.

In this article, I outline a practical framework for Operational Integrity built around five elements:

Operating Envelope | Strong Systems | Reliable Equipment | Leadership Cadence | Disciplined Operations

The goal is simple: help manufacturing organizations run with greater control, consistency, resilience, and accountability — for the benefit of employees, customers, communities, owners, and all stakeholders who depend on the enterprise. Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Employee Engagement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cyber-Physical Risk in the Age of AI: How Safety Professionals Help Directors Make Better Operational Technology Investment Decisions – Part 4

As the final article in this four-part series, Fay Feeney and I bring the conversation into the boardroom. Operational technology is no longer just an engineering concern—it is a governance test. As AI-enabled assets reshape industrial operations, directors are approving new risk profiles, resilience assumptions, and value-creation models. Continue reading

Posted in AI, Artificial Intelligence, EHS Management, enterprise risk management, Leadership, Machine Learning, Sustainability Leadership | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cyber-Physical Risk in the Age of AI: How Safety Professionals Identify and Manage OT Cyber Risk – Part 3

Part 3 moves from understanding the risk to executing against it. As cyber threats increasingly intersect with physical operations, organizations need a practical, structured approach to manage these risks at the system level. This section outlines how safety professionals—working with cybersecurity and engineering teams—can apply proven process safety methods to identify vulnerabilities, prioritize risk, protect critical systems, and strengthen operational resilience in the face of cyber-physical threats. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Automated Reasoning for Human Error Detection in Industrial Operations

Most incidents aren’t caused by a single mistake—they result from conditions that made failure likely long before it happened.

In this article, I explore how automated reasoning can help EHS and operational leaders detect those conditions earlier, connect weak signals, and make more consistent, defensible decisions in real time. Just as important, I outline where technology stops—and where human leadership, trust, and judgment still determine outcomes.
The future of safety isn’t human or AI—it’s the integration of both to anticipate risk and act before it becomes reality. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cyber-Physical Risk in the Age of AI: How Safety Leaders and Boards Can Protect Operational Technology – Part 2

AI is changing the rules of cyber risk—and in OT environments, the consequences are no longer just digital.

From process instability to SIF potential, cyber threats are now operational threats. The real question isn’t if this risk exists—it’s whether we’re integrating safety, cyber, and operations fast enough to manage it.

Part 2 explores how AI is both accelerating the threat—and becoming a critical part of the defense. Continue reading

Posted in AI, enterprise risk management, Technical Skills | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cyber-Physical Risk in the Age of AI: How Safety Leaders and Boards Can Protect Operational Technology – Part 1

Artificial intelligence is reshaping cyber risk — and for industrial organizations, the stakes are no longer just digital.

Cyber attacks on operational technology (OT) can now disrupt physical processes, threaten worker safety, and create significant economic impact. Managing this evolving risk requires new thinking that connects plant-level realities with boardroom oversight.

I’m excited to share a new four-part thought leadership series I’ve co-authored with Fay Feeney, bringing together perspectives from industrial safety leadership and enterprise governance.

Together we explore how organizations can strengthen operational resilience, cyber-physical risk management, and strategic oversight in the age of AI.

Part 1 is now available — more to follow soon.

#OperationalTechnology #CyberSecurity #AI #IndustrialSafety #RiskManagement #BoardGovernance #Resilience Continue reading

Posted in AI, Artificial Intelligence, Design for Safety | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Building Sustainable Leadership: Why It Matters More Than Ever

What if leadership itself were treated as a renewable resource rather than a consumable one? First introduced at the ASSP Management Systems Symposium, the sustainable leadership framework was designed to help organizations perform today without eroding the people, trust, and systems they depend on tomorrow. In an era shaped by AI, complexity, and constant disruption, its seven tenets offer a practical blueprint for building leadership that endures. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment